Blockchain Node Service Providers Comparison: Tokenview, Infura, Alchemy, and QuickNode

With the conclusion of Hong Kong’s Web3 Conference, the blockchain industry has reached new heights of activity. As Web3 welcomes more innovative projects, developers building decentralized applications (DApps) require blockchain nodes to host smart contracts—a process that can be complex and time-consuming for newcomers.

This is where blockchain node service providers like Tokenview, Infura, Alchemy, and QuickNode come in. These providers offer remote access to blockchain services without the need to set up independent nodes, saving developers both time and costs. This article compares these four leading node providers based on:

👉 API services, documentation, pricing, supported blockchains, and additional offerings—helping developers choose the best fit for their projects.

1. Overview of Providers

Tokenview

• Website: Tokenview Node Service
• Established in 2017, Tokenview operates 120+ blockchain explorers and specializes in BTC, ETH, and TRON node services.
• Known for stability and real-time data accuracy, it supports dApp development across multiple protocols.

Infura

• Website: Infura
• Acquired by ConsenSys (MetaMask’s parent company), Infura focuses on Ethereum-based projects, supporting 10+ Layer 1 and Layer 2 chains.
• Offers IPFS API for decentralized file storage.

Alchemy

• Website: Alchemy Supernode
• A Web3 developer toolkit providing node management, testnet support, and DApp monitoring.
• Supports 7+ blockchains with comprehensive debugging tools.

QuickNode

• Website: QuickNode Core API
• A global Web3 cloud platform with nodes worldwide, offering JSON-RPC access for 19+ blockchains.
• Trusted by major blockchain projects for scalability.

2. API Services Comparison

| Service | Tokenview | Infura | Alchemy | QuickNode |
|-------------------|-----------|--------|---------|-----------|
| RPC Node | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Archive Data | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Webhooks | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| NFT API | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |

• Archive Data API: Exclusive to Tokenview, this service provides historical blockchain data (120+ chains).
• NFT APIs: Alchemy and QuickNode offer detailed NFT tracking (collections, events, etc.).

3. Supported Blockchains

| Provider | Supported Chains |
|-------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Tokenview | ETH, BTC, TRON + 120+ others (Archive) |
| Infura | Ethereum, Layer 2 (10 chains) |
| Alchemy | 7 chains + testnets |
| QuickNode | 19 chains + testnets |

👉 See full chain compatibility

4. Documentation & Pricing

Documentation

• Tokenview: Bilingual (EN/CN).
• Others: English-only.

Pricing

• Free tiers available for all providers.
• Tokenview/QuickNode: Pay-as-you-go options.
• Alchemy: Compute Units (CU) system (e.g., 10 CU per blockNumber request).

5. FAQs

Q1: Which provider is best for Ethereum developers?

• Infura (Ethereum-focused) or Alchemy (testnet support).

Q2: Does Tokenview support Bitcoin nodes?

• Yes, alongside ETH/TRON.

Q3: Are there free plans?

• All four offer free tiers with limited requests.

Q4: Which provider has the best historical data?

• Tokenview’s Archive API (120+ chains).

Conclusion

Choose based on:

1. Supported chains (Multi-chain? Ethereum-only?).
2. Data needs (Archive vs. real-time).
3. Budget (Free tiers vs. enterprise plans).

For comprehensive coverage, Tokenview’s Archive API and multi-chain support stand out. For Ethereum-specific projects, Infura or Alchemy may suffice.